This is not a news story that needs any further promotion, but what The Daily Star has done has highlighted what is wrong with the tabloid media today, and in no small way either.
The story is about someone who has been labelled a former 'it' girl. She also happens to be the Daughter of the 6th Marquess of Bristol, and elder sister of the current holder of that title, and the story concerns the outfit she wore to a party in Los Angeles, something she actually tweeted about, including a picture, obviously taken in the back of her limo, which gave a slight preview of her dress. In other words, this ain't much of a story.
But, The Daily Star, also known as the Daily Star-Struck(!), decided it was worth covering and hyping to levels unseen outside of the Superbowl or the Olympics. To do that, they describe her outfit thusly...
"...The socialite merged gapboob and dominatrix leather while attending a charity gala in California..."
Gapboob? The very fact that the computer I am writing this post on doesn't even recognise gapboob as a word says a lot. It's a made-up word, because somehow they think their audience won't understand the technical term of cleavage.
As for it being 'dominatrix leather', leather is worn by many people other than dominatrix-types, but of course, since the whole '50 Shades of Grey' thing became popular, tying it in to that imagery has become the standard thing to do. But somehow, I can't imagine a dominatrix wearing a full length dress with a fishtail hem, as the Daily Star describe it...
"...The full-length frock, complete with fishtail hem, was made from biker chick leather, bringing a very Fifty Shades of Grey vibe to proceedings..."
See what I mean about '50 Shades of Grey'? Wait, it gets worse...
"...Lady Victoria's attempts to soften her look with an elegant updo and silver chandelier earrings failed to steer this look away from fetish friendly as she attended the unite4:humanity red carpet event..."
First, why would you need to steer this look away from fetish friendly? Second, she looked glamourous, stylish and elegant in that dress. And that is something not every woman could achieve.
She pulls of an elegant look, with leather, and she is critcised in the article for an indecent neckline, and wearing dominatrix leather. Is it any wonder that newspapers are losing readers, as their grip on the real world seems to get more tenuous by the day, and the amount of hype that they put in to a non-story to make it a story, does the exact opposite of justifying the story's existence in the newspaper. It highlights that the 'story' probably should never have appeared.
More power to Lady Victoria Hervey, I say, for wearing a very stylish leather dress, that made her look stunning.
No comments:
Post a Comment