OFCOM has repeatedly had problems regulating the kind of sexy phone in channels that appear on Sky in the 900s section of the EPG.
Just recently, OFCOM fined two companies for broadcasting sexy material straight after the watershed on FTA channels. Now, bear in mind, the watershed is 9pm. By OFCOM’s own definition…
“…The watershed only applies to television. The watershed is at 2100. Material unsuitable for children should not, in general, be shown before 2100 or after 0530.”
It was material unsuitable for children, and it was broadcast after the watershed, yet they were still fined.
Additionally in the same Broadcast Bulletin, OFCOM found the channels in breach on about 10 separate occasions, despite the fact that only 1 of these occasion actually contravenes OFCOM’s own rules about R18-strength material. All other incidents related to material comparable to those seen in movies rated 18 by the BBFC.
This is why I find the whole business of regulation these days to be totally out of sync with reality. We see more violence on television dramas and movies than we see sex, and sex is regarded as the more corrupting, yet there has been many occasions when words encouraging violent acts have brought those acts about. That’s called Incitement, and its against the law. Yet the right wing will say, “NO, sorry, you can’t encourage someone to commit a violent act.”, yet in the same breath, they will say that the depiction of sex is a “…corrupting influence…”. There’s only one thing to say to a viewpoint like that.
“THAT’S A TOTALLY HYPOCRITICAL AND NONSENSICAL VIEWPOINT. The facts do NOT back up your views.”
But then the right wing doesn’t seem to let facts get in the way of their own delusions.
In OFCOM’s case here, they are trying to walk what they consider to be a tightrope, when in fact, beneath that “tightrope” is a canyon the size of the Grand Canyon, with the pro-censorship brigade on one side, and reality (and just about everybody else) on the other. There’s no fine line between the camps, there’s a huge gap, and you’re NEVER gonna satisfy the pro-censorship camp, so don’t waste your time trying to.
Besides which, the Virgin Media, Freeview, Freesat and Sky platforms all have a facility called PIN protection. Basically, you can block access to programmes and channels you don’t want kids to watch by setting a PIN.
This smacks of censorship by stealth, and to be frank, it is not OFCOM’s job to be am self-appointed censor. That the BBFC’s job. And if material is shown that IS comparable to material shown in films that have been rated by the BBFC as 18, then OFCOM HAS NO BUSINESS TRYING TO CENSOR IT.